Papers
arxiv:2410.01171

Multilingual Retrieval Augmented Generation for Culturally-Sensitive Tasks: A Benchmark for Cross-lingual Robustness

Published on Jun 22, 2025
· Submitted by
Bryan Li
on Oct 3, 2024
Authors:
,
,
,
,
,
,
,

Abstract

Multilingual retrieval-augmented generation for territorial disputes reveals that diverse-language documents improve consistency and reduce geopolitical bias, though citation patterns vary widely for low-resource languages.

The paradigm of retrieval-augmented generated (RAG) helps mitigate hallucinations of large language models (LLMs). However, RAG also introduces biases contained within the retrieved documents. These biases can be amplified in scenarios which are multilingual and culturally-sensitive, such as territorial disputes. We thus introduce BordIRLines, a dataset of territorial disputes paired with retrieved Wikipedia documents, across 49 languages. We evaluate the cross-lingual robustness of this RAG setting by formalizing several modes for multilingual retrieval. Our experiments on several LLMs show that incorporating perspectives from diverse languages can in fact improve robustness; retrieving multilingual documents best improves response consistency and decreases geopolitical bias over RAG with purely in-language documents. We also consider how RAG responses utilize presented documents, finding a much wider variance in the linguistic distribution of response citations, when querying in low-resource languages. Our further analyses investigate the various aspects of a cross-lingual RAG pipeline, from retrieval to document contents. We release our benchmark and code to support continued research towards equitable information access across languages at https://huggingface.co/datasets/borderlines/bordirlines.

Community

Paper author Paper submitter

BordIRlines: A Dataset for Evaluating Cross-lingual Retrieval-Augmented Generation

This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.

The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API

Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!

If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space

You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend

Interesting idea, but I would imagine most LLMs and embedding models have seen wikipedia. But I love that there is energy in x-lingual RAG. Keep up the good work!

·
Paper author

Exactly, this is how the dataset is designed! the models have likely seen the retrieved Wikipedia passages already, which is the same as TydiQA, MIRACL, any other open domain qa dataset. However, for our task, territorial disputes, the answers are necessarily lingusitically, politically, and culturally dependent. So the explicit retrieval of different relevant passages with different language and viewpoints, and how this affects LLM's responses, is what our benchmark studies.

Sign up or log in to comment

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2410.01171
Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash

Models citing this paper 0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2410.01171 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper 1

Spaces citing this paper 0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2410.01171 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper 0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to a collection to link it from this page.